Teams shipping with AI agents

A signed record of what was tested — and context your agents can act on.

When AI coding agents write the code, Microfilm keeps a signed, traceable record of what was tested and why each change is trusted — and hands those same structured facts to your agents through an MCP server, so the fix loop starts informed instead of guessing.

When AI coding agents are writing and changing code fast, the open question is trust: what was actually tested, and why do you believe this change is safe to ship? Microfilm keeps a signed, traceable record of the QA behind every change — and feeds your agents the same structured evidence through a native MCP server, so the fix loop starts from what actually happened.

Availability · Capture and signing are free forever on the desktop app. The MCP server, ticket integrations, and traceability matrix are Team-and-up cloud features.

What Microfilm is · Microfilm is a desktop app and cloud service that records software QA testing as it happens and turns it into signed, tamper-evident, audit-ready evidence — readable by both human auditors and AI coding agents.

MICROFILM AI-assisted · evidence
Change record
Change
Agent-authored · PR #418
Tested
TC-417 · TC-418
Observed
Pass · evidence linked
Record
Signed · append-only
Read via
MCP server

The pain

Fast-moving, agent-written code outruns the proof that it works.

AI coding agents generate and change code faster than a team can manually document what was checked. The risk isn’t just bugs — it’s that nobody can say, after the fact, what was tested and why a change was trusted. And an agent handed a one-line "it’s broken" guesses at the fix, burning tokens and time on a problem it can’t actually see.

How it maps

Capture once. Trust the change. Feed your agents.

Microfilm runs the same four steps the rest of the site does — Capture, Sign, Hand off, Trace — but here the hand-off has a second reader: the coding agents on your team.

Capture Sign Hand off Trace
Capture

Testing recorded against the change

Each session is captured against the requirement and the change under test — screen, narration, and what the tester observed — as the work happens.

Sign

A signed answer to “why do we trust this?”

Every change carries a signed, append-only record — the requirement, the tests run, what was observed, and who attested it — so trust in an agent-authored change is backed by evidence, not assertion.

Hand off

Structured context humans and agents share

A failure routes to the ticket and to your coding agents through a native MCP server — the requirement, expected result, what was observed, and a link to the capture — the same structured context, read two ways.

Trace

One source of truth that keeps pace

Requirement → test → evidence → signature stays linked as agents move fast, so the proof keeps up with the change and there’s no separate “agent version” of the truth to drift.

For your coding agents

How the MCP feed hands agents what they need.

The same signed evidence a developer reads on the ticket is exposed to your coding agents through a native Model Context Protocol (MCP) server — structured, not a screenshot they can’t parse. The fix loop starts from what actually happened.

01

A native MCP server

Point your agents at Microfilm’s MCP server and they read the QA evidence directly — no scraping screenshots, no copy-pasting logs into a prompt.

02

Structured failure context

On a failed test the agent gets the requirement, the expected result, what the tester observed, and a deep link to the capture — the facts it needs to reproduce and fix, in a shape it can act on.

03

One source of truth

The tester, the developer, and the agent all work from the same signed record. There’s no separate “agent version” of the truth to drift out of sync.

04

The fix loop starts informed

Because the agent’s first attempt is grounded in what actually happened — not a one-line “it’s broken” — it spends fewer cycles guessing and more landing the fix.

FAQ

Common questions.

Does Microfilm review AI-generated code?

No. Microfilm records and proves the QA behind a change and feeds agents structured context to fix failures — it doesn’t review or certify the code itself. The decision that a change is safe to ship stays with your team; Microfilm gives you the evidence to make and defend it.

How do AI coding agents use Microfilm?

Through a native Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. When a test fails, the agent reads the requirement, the expected result, what the tester observed, and a link to the capture — the same structured evidence a human developer sees — so its first fix attempt is grounded in what actually happened.

What does "accountable QA" mean here?

That for any change — including one an agent authored — there’s a signed, traceable record of what was tested, what was observed, and who attested it. You can answer "why do we trust this?" with evidence rather than a claim.

Is this available on the free plan?

Capture and signing are free on the desktop app. The MCP server, ticket integrations, and traceability matrix are cloud capabilities on the Team plan and up.

Keep exploring

Microfilm records and proves the QA behind AI-assisted changes; it does not review or certify AI-generated code on its own. The decision that a change is safe to ship stays with your team — Microfilm gives you the evidence to make and defend it.

Start building your evidence trail.

Create a workspace for your team, or download the free capture app and record your first session.